DIVORCING THE SYSTEM AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

THE OTHER DAY I CREATED A PAGE CALLED

* WARNING: IDENTITY THEFT & YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/page/warning-identity-theft-your

AS I HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR ANY INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT THAT I MIGHT HAVE...

NOW I MUST ISSUE AN EVEN BIGGER


YOU WERE DECLARED DEAD BY CORPORATE AMERICA AT BIRTH

THE CORPS CALLED YOU A CORPS...

FROM THE BENCH WHICH IS LATIN FOR BANK

WHAT MOST PEOPLE FAIL TO EVEN BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND... IS THAT YOUR IDENTITY WAS REPORTED AS SECURITY = PROPERTY (HENCE SOCIAL SECURITY), BY YOUR PARENTS OR INFORMANTS (LOOK ON YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE WHERE THEY SIGNED), YOUR BODY WAS THEN GIVEN AS COLLATERAL BY THE CORPORATE FEDERAL RESERVE = WORLD BANKS (IN PLACE OF GOLD) AND THEN TRADED BY THE WORLD BANKS... AS STOCK ON THE STOCK MARKET... JUST HOURS, DAYS AFTER YOU WERE BORN.

THIS IS WHY ANY AND ALL LEGAL PAPERS YOU RECEIVE BY THE CORPORATE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR THE CORPORATE COURTS THAT HAVE YOUR NAME ON THEM, YOUR NAME IS ALWAYS " WRITTEN IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS."

WHY ?

YOU HAVE BEEN DECLARED DEAD, SO YOU COULD BE TRADED AS PROPERTY OF THE
" CORPORATION UNITED STATES " AND " ALL CAPS " IS YOUR CORPORATE SURROGATE OR CORPS THAT IS REPRESENTING THE FLESH AND BLOOD YOU, IN THE CORPORATE SYSTEM.

THE QUESTION IS ARE YOU COMMON OR PREFERRED STOCK ???

THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS THE LAWS SURROUNDING THIS LIE...



AS FOR DIVORCE...

aka " FREEMAN or REDEMPTION MOVEMENT "

I HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS MYSELF FOR SOME TIME NOW.

FOR MANY DIFFERENT REASONS... BUT MAINLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE SYSTEM IS A LIE AND A TRAP.

NOT TO MENTION, THAT IT USES SLAVERY AND DEATH AS LOGS FOR THE FIRE TO FUEL SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN THE CAPITALIST MARKET.

I GET SPIRITUALLY SICK WHEN I HAVE EXPLAINED THIS TO SOMEONE AND THEY LOOK AT ME AND SAY... THAT IS THE WAY IT OUGHT TO BE.

YES, WE SHOULD ALL BE SOLD INTO SLAVERY AT BIRTH SO THAT THE RICH GET RICHER.

I THINK NOT.

FURTHER MORE... I THINK MANY OF OUR FOUNDING FATHER'S NOT ONLY DISAGREED WITH THIS, BUT ALSO TRIED TO WARN US OF THESE POSSIBILITIES OCCURRING OVER TIME, IF WE WERE NOT WATCHFUL...

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/page/do-you-support-the

EVEN IN OUR CONSTITUTION IT'S SELF

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/the-constitution

SO WHAT IS THE " REDEMPTION MOVEMENT " ABOUT ???

DECLARING YOUR SOVEREIGNTY

REDEEMING ONES SELF FROM THE SYSTEM

TO STAND ON ONES OWN

IT CAN BE DONE AND HAS BEEN BY OTHER FREEMEN

BUT, YOU MUST STUDY AND KNOW YOUR P'S AND Q'S ON THIS... YOU MUST KNOW THIS BETTER THAN THE JUDGE... OR THEY WILL MAKE MINCE MEAT OUT OF YOU IN COURT.

YOU MUST BE CONFIDENT IN WHAT YOU KNOW.

IF YOU SUCCEED

YOU SUCCESSFULLY MOVE TO THE PRIVATE SIDE

THIS MEANS " YOU ARE NO LONGER PROPERTY OF THE STATE "

YOU THEN NO LONGER ANSWER TO STATE RULES

SUCH AS... DRIVERS LICENSE, MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION, MARRIAGE LICENSE, OR INCOME TAX

OF COURSE, THIS ALSO MEANS YOU CAN NOT APPLY FOR STATE AID OR WELFARE...

DIVORCING YOUR SELF FROM SOCIAL SECURITY... MEDICAID...





THIS CAN ALSO BE VERY EMPOWERING

FOR AN INDIVIDUAL

OUR AN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY

OF COURSE THIS MEANS TO STAND ON YOUR OWN, KNOWING YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE FOUNDING CONSTITUTION OF YOUR STATE AND THE FOUNDING U.S. CONSTITUTION

MOST STATES ADOPTED A SECOND CORPORATE CONSTITUTION YEARS AFTER THE FOUNDING CONSTITUTION

THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS

NOR DO THEY WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THIS CORPORATE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ABROGATE OR CANCEL OUT THE FOUNDING CONSTITUTION.

THIS VIDEO FROM THE HISTORY CHANNEL EXPLAINS HOW THIS OCCURRED


The Secret Rulers of the World 5of29


SO AS LITTLE KNOWN AS IT IS TO MOST PEOPLE... THE CLASS TERMED " U.S. CITIZEN " DID NOT EXIST AS A POLITICAL STATUS UNTIL 1866.

THIS CLASS AND " POLITICAL STATUS " WAS CREATED FOR THE NEWLY FREED SLAVES AND DID NOT APPLY TO THE PEOPLE INHIBITING THE STATES OF THE UNION. THEY WERE STATES CITIZENS.

I QUOTE

"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. . ." Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.

"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.

NO, I AM NOT A RACIST OR A BIGOT

JUST STATING THE FACTS IN THIS ISSUE.

THE FACTS ARE THE " POLITICAL CLASS " TERMED " U.S. CITIZENS " WAS IN FACT CREATED FOR THE " NEWLY FREED SLAVES ONLY ".

WHO WERE NEVER REALLY FREED AT ALL... BECAUSE UNDER THIS CLASSIFICATION THEY LATER BECAME COLLATERAL TO THE BANKS FOR THE WAR DEBT, AND ALL NATIONAL DEBT... AND NOW FREED THEY HAD BECOME SLAVES OF THE UNITED STATES, AS THEY BECAME ASSETS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY.

AS FOR THE TRUE INTENT OF THE DRAFTERS OF THE SO-CALLED 14 AMENDMENT ???

IT WAS IN FACT WRITTEN BECAUSE THAT NOW THAT THEY THE "NEWLY FREED SLAVES " HAD BECOME RECOGNIZED AS PEOPLE RATHER THAN " ANIMATE PROPERTY ", THEY NEEDED TO BE BROUGHT INTO THE " NATURALIZATION PROCESS " AND AFFORDED SOME NATURAL RIGHTS. BECAUSE UNTIL THIS TIME AS PROPERTY... THEY HAD NO RIGHTS.

I QUOTE

“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it’s own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

SO WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE IN BECOMING A FREE MAN ???

OR A " STATES CITIZEN " ???

MAINLY BECAUSE THE RULES THAT APPLY TO " U.S. CITIZENS " ARE NOT THE SAME RULES THAT APPLY TO " STATES CITIZENS "

AND THAT THE RIGHTS OF ONE ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE RIGHTS OF THE OTHER.

EXAMPLE : A "STATE CITIZEN" IS NOT REQUIRED LEGALLY TO REGISTER HIS VEHICLE OR HAVE A DRIVERS LICENSE TO GO TO THE STORE TO PURCHASE HIS FOOD, TO DRIVE TO THE DOCTORS FOR TREATMENT, OR TO ATTEND HIS PLACE OF WORSHIP... WHERE A " U.S. CITIZEN " IS REQUIRED TO DO, HAVE AND POSSESS BY LAW.

I QUOTE

“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”. Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)

“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”. Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)

WHY ???

IT IS ALL ABOUT NATURAL BIRTH RIGHT

THIS CRACKS ME UP... AS SOMEONE WHO IS PART NATIVE AMERICAN.

AS WELL AS BRINGS MY BLOOD TO A BOIL...

SO HOW DOES ONE REMOVE, REDEEM HIMSELF ???

CLAIM HIS NATURAL RIGHTS AS A "STATE CITIZEN " WHICH ARE STILL PROTECTED BY THE STATE CONSTITUTION

I QUOTE

“...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

SUI JURIS. One who has all the rights to which a freemen is entitled; one who is not under the power of another, as a slave, a minor, and the like. 2. To make a valid contract, a person must, in general, be sui juris. Every one of full age is presumed to be sui juris. Story on Ag. p. 10. Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856

INGENUI, civ. law. Those freemen who were born free. Vicat, vocab. 2. They were a class of freemen, distinguished from those who, born slaves, had afterwards legally obtained their freedom the latter were called at various periods, sometimes liberti, sometimes libertini. An unjust or illegal servitude did not prevent a man from being ingenuus. Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856

JURIS ET DE JURE. A phrase employed to denote conclusive presumptions of law, which cannot be rebutted by evidence. The words signify of law and from law. Best on Presumption, Sec. 17. Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856

BY DIVORCING THE SYSTEM...

HERE IS THE HISTORIC LEGAL TRUTH YOU WILL NOT BE TAUGHT IN ANY BASIC PUBLIC SCHOOL OR EVEN LAW SCHOOL.

THE ELEMENTS OF THE LAW ARE BASICALLY THE SAME NO MATTER THE ALLEGATION... WHETHER IT IS A SIMPLE TRAFFIC TICKET OR ANY OTHER LEGAL SITUATION.

Sublata causa tollitur effectus. Remove the cause and the effect will cease. 2 Bl. Com. 203.

Sublato fundamento cadit opus. Remove the foundation, the structure or work fall.



* PDF ~ A PATH TO FREEDOM

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/the-path-to-freedom



* THE SECRET TO REMAINING FREE, SOVEREIGN, and FOREIGN in Respect to a Corrupted Government

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Sovereignty/SecretToSovereignty.htm



* PDF ~ SOVEREIGNTY FORMS AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/sovereignty-forms-and



* THE SOVEREIGNTY AND DEFENSE OF SOVEREIGNTY COLLEGE

http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/FormsInstr.htm



* PDF ~ RESIGNATION OF COMPELLED SOCIAL SECURITY TRUSTEE FORM INSTRUCTIONS

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/resignation-of-compelled


* FORMS: 4.13 LEGAL NOTICE OF CHANGE IN DOMICILE/CITIZENSHIP RECORDS AND DIVORCE FROM THE UNITED STATES, IS A " ZIP FILE " ATTACHED BY FOLLOWING THE FOLLOWING PAGE LINK

* THE FOLLOWING " ZIP FILE " CONTAINS

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/forms-413-legal-notice-of

Enclosures:

2.* PDF ~ Department of State form DS-11 (modified to remove presumptions). Fill in according to instructions found in this article and step 3.13 of the Income Tax Freedom Forms and Instructions, INSTRUCTIONS area

3. * PDF ~ ~ FS-581: Questionnaire for Determining Citizenship

Related forms:

4.22: Request for Certificate of non-Citizen National Status from Dept of State

Common Law Library Web Site-see following forms, which are very good

Cancelatura
Cancelatura Package Construction-
Notice of Expatriation

Related articles:

* 3.13: Correct government records documenting your citizenship status-Income Tax Freedom Forms and Instructions Why you are a "national" or a "state national" and not a "U.S. citizen"

* Tax Deposition Questions, Section 14: Citizenship-evidence that proves why this form is necessary

* You're not a a "citizen" under the Internal Revenue Code
* You're not a "resident" under the Internal Revenue Code
* References on Expatriation
* "U.S. citizen" defined
* "U.S. national" defined

Sample government responses:

* PDF ~ Response from Dept. of State (see Evidence, item 14.3)
* PDF ~ Response from Social Security Administration (SSA) (see Evidence, item 14.4)

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This document is NOT the same as the documents or process associated with the service formerly offered by independent third parties called the "Administrative Repudiation Process", and which was formerly mentioned on the SEDM website at http://sedm.org but was never offered directly by SEDM. This is our own free version of that process which we think is better. We have never and will never offer any of the information or processes for sale that appear on this website in any form. We insist on doing this in order to maintain this entire website as "protected First Amendment speech".

Please do not call for help with the process of correcting government records to correctly reflect your citizenship status, because we can't give it. However, if you find something in error with this document or have something important to add based on your own research, we would appreciate hearing about it so we can promptly fix it. Also, be advised that the reason for using this document is not to avoid taxes, but to remove federal government jurisdiction over you because of errors in their records. This subject is covered in more detail in Great IRS Hoax, section 4.11.10.4.

This document is to be sent to either the Secretary of State of the United States, the Secretary of State of your State, and the Attorney General of the United States. It:

1. Establishes the equivalent of a legal, political, and commercial divorce from the United States.

2.Establishes you in the records of the government as a "national" and a "state national" pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and not a statutory "U.S. citizen" pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1401.

3. Establishes you as a "nonresident alien" not engaged in a "trade or business" as defined in 26 CFR §1.871-1(b)(ii).

4. Establishes you as a "nontaxpayer" not subject to the Internal Revenue Code or the civil laws where you live.

5. Requests help from the government eliminating all forms of unlawful duress and prejudicial presumption which might compel you to assume anything other than the above statuses.

6. Creates presumptions in your favor that will be useful as a defense in court should the government ever attempt to prosecute you for a tax crime.



* PDF ~ Why Domicile and Becoming a "Taxpayer" Require Your Consent, #05.001

http://diversesanctuary.ning.com/group/diversesanctuaryslibrary/forum/topics/why-domicile-and-becoming-a



to be cont.

FROM: http://www.mind-trek.com/practicl/afdv-gen.htm

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

Be it known to all who call themselves "government," their "courts," agents, and other parties, that I,

_____________________________________________,
am a natural, freeborn sovereign individual, without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated.

I am not a "person" as defined in "statutes" when such definition includes "artificial entities." I refuse to be treated as a "federally" or "state" created entity which is only capable of exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically "granted" by "federal" or "state" "governments."

I may voluntarily choose to comply with the "laws" which others attempt to impose upon me, but no such "laws," nor their "enforcers," have any authority over me. I am not in any "jurisdiction," for I am not of subject status.

Unless I have wilfully harmed or violated someone or someone's property without their consent, I have not committed any crime, and am therefore not subject to any penalty.

Thus, be it known to all, that I reserve my natural right not to be compelled to perform under any "contract" that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Furthermore, I do not accept the "liability" associated with the compelled and pretended "benefit" of any hidden or unrevealed "contract" or "commercial agreement."

As such, the hidden or unrevealed "contracts" that supposedly create "obligations" to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed "benefits" associated with these hidden "contracts," I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received such "benefits" but I have not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.

Any such participation does not constitute "acceptance," because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid offer, and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion. Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no "meeting of the minds," and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed "contract" is therefore void, from the beginning.

From my age of consent to the date affixed below I have never signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, voluntarily, and intentionally whereby I have waived any of my natural inherent rights, and, as such, take notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning my signature on any and all "contracts," "agreements," "forms," or any "instrument" which may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any "government" any "authority," "venue," or "jurisdiction" over me.

Typical examples of such compelled and pretended "benefits" are:

1. "Birth Certificate": The fact that a "birth certificate" was issued to me by a local hospital or "government" agency when I was born, is irrelevant to my sovereignty. No status, high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the recipient's full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper provides date and place information only. It indicates nothing about "jurisdiction," nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. The only documents that can have any significance, as it concerns my status in society, are those which I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or coercion of any kind.
2. The use of national currency to discharge my debts: I have used these only because there is no other widely recognized currency.
3. The use of a bank account: If there is any hidden "contract" behind an account, my signature therewith gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of identity. I can not be obligated to fulfill any hidden or unrevealed "contract" whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent.

   Likewise, my use of the bank account is due to the absence of an alternative. To not use any bank at all is very difficult and impractical.

4. The use of a "driver's license": There is no real need for me to have such a "license" for travelling in a car. However, if I am stopped for any reason and found to be without a "license," it is likely I would be unduly harassed and penalized. Therefore, under duress, I carry a "license" only to avoid extreme inconvenience.
5. "State plates" on my car: Similarly, if I have "registered" my car with the "state" and carry the "state plates" on it, I have done so only because to have any other "plates" or no "plates" at all, causes me to run the risk of "police officer" harassment and extreme inconvenience.
6. The use of a "passport": There is no real need for me to have a "passport" (or other associated "permits," "visas," etc.) to travel. I have the right to travel without hindrance, wherever, however, and whenever I wish, so long as I do not encroach upon the private property of others. Though without a "passport," my right to travel is unduly hindered. Therefore, under duress, I only use a "passport" to prevent extreme inconvenience and to ensure that I can travel from one "country" to another at all.
7. Past "filing" of "tax returns": Because such "tax returns" were "filed" under threat, duress, and coercion, and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in any past "filing" of "tax returns" or payments that created any valid contract. Therefore, no obligation on my part was ever created.
8. Past "enrolment" and "voting": Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in print, as part of the "requirements" for the supposed "privilege" to "enrol" and "vote," any such "enrolment" or "voting" does not oblige me to do anything, nor grant any "jurisdiction" over me to anyone.
9. "Citizenship": Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the question, "Are you a [insert name of "country" here] citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as a sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed "citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no binding contract.

   I am not a "[insert name of "country" here] citizen." I am not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or "subject to the jurisdiction of" any "monarch" or any corporate "commonwealth," "federal," "state," "territory," "county," "council," "city," "municipal body politic," or other "government" allegedly "created" under the "authority" of a "constitution" or other "enactment." I am not subject to any "legislation," department, or agency created by such "authorities," nor to the "jurisdiction" of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their "authority" therefrom. Nor do any of the "statutes" or "regulations" of such "authorities" apply to me or have any "jurisdiction" over me.

   Further, I am not a subject of any "courts" or bound by "precedents" of any "courts," deriving their "jurisdiction" from said "authorities." Take notice that I hereby cancel and make void from the beginning any such "instrument" or any presumed "election" made by any "government" or any agency or department thereof, that I am or ever have voluntarily elected to be treated as a subject of any "monarch" or a "[insert name of "country" here] citizen," or a "resident" of any "commonwealth," "state," "territory," "possession," "instrumentality," "enclave," "division," "district," or "province," subject to their "jurisdiction(s)."

10. "Constitution": The document supposedly setting forth the foundations of a "country" and "its" "government," has no inherent authority or obligation. A "constitution" has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between two or more individuals, and then it is limited only to those individuals who have specifically entered into it. At most, such a document could be a contract between the existing people at the time of its creation, but no-one has the right, authority, or power to bind their posterity. I have not knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally entered into any such "constitution" contract to oblige myself thereby, therefore such a document is inapplicable to me, and anyone claiming to derive their "authority" from such a document has no "jurisdiction" over me.
11. Use of semantics: There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as "government," and call the noises and scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens "the law" which "must be obeyed." Just because they alter definitions of words in their "law" books to their supposed advantage, doesn't mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words "person," "address," "mail," "resident," "motor vehicle," "driving," "passenger," "employee," "income," and many others, in ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life.

    Because the "courts" have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all "courts" and all parties, that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on record, using words defined by twists in any "law" books different from the common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my sovereign status in society thereby, nor can there be created any "obligation" to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such words. Where the definition in the common dictionary differs from the definition in the "law" dictionary, it is the definition in the common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy.

Such compelled and supposed "benefits" include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged "benefits" is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my natural inherent rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled "benefits" may be temporary, until alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized.

REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY

I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in "law" or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to any "tax file/identification number" and/or "social security number" assigned to me, as it pertains to my "birth certificate," and as it pertains to any and all other numbers, "licenses," "certificates," and other "instruments" issued by any and all "government" and quasi-"governmental" departments or agencies, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or property.

I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged "benefit" or "gratuity" associated with any of the aforementioned numbers, "licenses," "certificates," and other "instruments." My use of any such numbers, "licenses," "certificates," or other "instruments" has been for information purposes only, and does not grant any "jurisdiction" to anyone.

I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in "law" or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property.

Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, "governmental" departments, agencies or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.

---

I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my inalienable rights and my specific right not to be bound by any "contract" or "obligation" which I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.

The use of notary below is for identification only, and such use does not grant any "jurisdiction" to anyone.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved,

(Printed Name:)________________________________.
Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris.

Signed:_________________________________

Date:_______________________
 
 
 

On this ________day of______________, ______, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for ________________________, personally appeared the above-signed, known to me to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that s/he has executed the same.

Signed:_______________________________________

Printed Name:__________________________________

Date:_________________________________________

Address:_______________________________________